This individual's Sinus Inflammation is generally lowest after a daily total of 300 milligrams of Cosentyx intake over the previous 33 days.
Join This Study
Go To Interactive Study
Blue represents the sum of Cosentyx intake over the previous 33 days
An increase in 33 days cumulative Cosentyx intake is usually followed by an decrease in Sinus Inflammation. (R = -0.183)
Typical values for Sinus Inflammation following a given amount of Cosentyx intake over the previous 33 days.
Typical Cosentyx intake seen over the previous 33 days preceding the given Sinus Inflammation value.
Correlation between outcome and aggregated predictor measurements over given number of days
Peak correlation suggests the delay between predictor and observable outcome
This chart shows how your Cosentyx changes over time.
Each column represents the number of days this value occurred.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Cosentyx on each day of the week.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Cosentyx for each month of the year.
This chart shows how your Sinus Inflammation changes over time.
Each column represents the number of days this value occurred.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Sinus Inflammation on each day of the week.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Sinus Inflammation for each month of the year.

Abstract

This individual's Sinus Inflammation is generally 12% lower than normal after 300 milligrams Cosentyx per 33 days. This individual's data suggests with a high degree of confidence (p=5.2772342619532E-7, 95% CI -0.317 to -0.049) that Cosentyx has a weakly negative predictive relationship (R=-0.18) with Sinus Inflammation. The highest quartile of Sinus Inflammation measurements were observed following an average 122.29 milligrams Cosentyx per day. The lowest quartile of Sinus Inflammation measurements were observed following an average 168.80466472303 mg Cosentyx per day.Sinus Inflammation is generally 12% lower than normal after a total of 168.80466472303 milligrams of Cosentyx intake over the previous 33 days. Sinus Inflammation is generally 9% higher after a total of 122.29 milligrams of Cosentyx intake over the previous 33 days.

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the nature of the relationship (if any) between Cosentyx and Sinus Inflammation. Additionally, we attempt to determine the Cosentyx values most likely to produce optimal Sinus Inflammation values.

Participant Instructions

Record your Cosentyx daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.
Record your Sinus Inflammation daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.

Design

This study is based on data donated by one participant. Thus, the study design is consistent with an n=1 observational natural experiment.

Data Analysis

Cosentyx Pre-Processing
Cosentyx measurement values below 0 milligrams were assumed erroneous and removed. No maximum allowed measurement value was defined for Cosentyx. It was assumed that any gaps in Cosentyx data were unrecorded 0 milligrams measurement values.
Cosentyx Analysis Settings

Sinus Inflammation Pre-Processing
Sinus Inflammation measurement values below 1 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. Sinus Inflammation measurement values above 5 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. No missing data filling value was defined for Sinus Inflammation so any gaps in data were just not analyzed instead of assuming zero values for those times.
Sinus Inflammation Analysis Settings

Predictive Analytics
It was assumed that 168 hours would pass before a change in Cosentyx would produce an observable change in Sinus Inflammation. It was assumed that Cosentyx could produce an observable change in Sinus Inflammation for as much as 33.33 days after the stimulus event.
Predictive Analysis Settings

Data Quantity
30 raw Cosentyx measurements with 50 changes spanning 1205 days from 2015-12-03 to 2019-03-22 were used in this analysis. 548 raw Sinus Inflammation measurements with 262 changes spanning 956 days from 2015-12-31 to 2018-08-13 were used in this analysis.

Data Sources

Cosentyx data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Sinus Inflammation data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Limitations

As with any human experiment, it was impossible to control for all potentially confounding variables. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. We can never know for sure if one factor is definitely the cause of an outcome. However, lack of correlation definitely implies the lack of a causal relationship. Hence, we can with great confidence rule out non-existent relationships. For instance, if we discover no relationship between mood and an antidepressant this information is just as or even more valuable than the discovery that there is a relationship.
We can also take advantage of several characteristics of time series data from many subjects to infer the likelihood of a causal relationship if we do find a correlational relationship. The criteria for causation are a group of minimal conditions necessary to provide adequate evidence of a causal relationship between an incidence and a possible consequence.

The list of the criteria is as follows:
Strength (A.K.A. Effect Size)
A small association does not mean that there is not a causal effect, though the larger the association, the more likely that it is causal. There is a weakly negative relationship between Cosentyx intake and Sinus Inflammation

Consistency (A.K.A. Reproducibility)
Consistent findings observed by different persons in different places with different samples strengthens the likelihood of an effect. Furthermore, in accordance with the law of large numbers (LLN), the predictive power and accuracy of these results will continually grow over time. 500 paired data points were used in this analysis. Assuming that the relationship is merely coincidental, as the participant independently modifies their Cosentyx intake values, the observed strength of the relationship will decline until it is below the threshold of significance. To it another way, in the case that we do find a spurious correlation, suggesting that banana intake improves mood for instance, one will likely increase their banana intake. Due to the fact that this correlation is spurious, it is unlikely that you will see a continued and persistent corresponding increase in mood. So over time, the spurious correlation will naturally dissipate.

Specificity
Causation is likely if a very specific population at a specific site and disease with no other likely explanation. The more specific an association between a factor and an effect is, the bigger the probability of a causal relationship.

Temporality
The effect has to occur after the cause (and if there is an expected delay between the cause and expected effect, then the effect must occur after that delay). The confidence in a causal relationship is bolstered by the fact that time-precedence was taken into account in all calculations.

Biological Gradient
Greater exposure should generally lead to greater incidence of the effect. However, in some cases, the mere presence of the factor can trigger the effect. In other cases, an inverse proportion is observed: greater exposure leads to lower incidence.

Plausibility
A plausible bio-chemical mechanism between cause and effect is critical. This is where human brains excel. Based on our responses so far, 1 humans feel that there is a plausible mechanism of action and 0 feel that any relationship observed between Cosentyx intake and Sinus Inflammation is coincidental.

Coherence
Coherence between epidemiological and laboratory findings increases the likelihood of an effect. It will be very enlightening to aggregate this data with the data from other participants with similar genetic, diseasomic, environmentomic, and demographic profiles.

Experiment
All of human life can be considered a natural experiment. Occasionally, it is possible to appeal to experimental evidence.

Analogy
The effect of similar factors may be considered.

Relationship Statistics

Property Value
Cause Variable Name Cosentyx intake
Effect Variable Name Sinus Inflammation
Sinn Predictive Coefficient 0.0671
Confidence Level high
Confidence Interval 0.13364232193054
Forward Pearson Correlation Coefficient -0.183
Critical T Value 1.646
Total Cosentyx intake Over Previous 33 days Before ABOVE Average Sinus Inflammation 122.29 milligrams
Total Cosentyx intake Over Previous 33 days Before BELOW Average Sinus Inflammation 168.805 milligrams
Duration of Action 33 days
Effect Size weakly negative
Number of Paired Measurements 500
Optimal Pearson Product 0.042836816347084
P Value 5.2772342619532E-7
Statistical Significance 0.3664
Strength of Relationship 0.13364232193054
Study Type individual
Analysis Performed At 2019-06-15

Cosentyx Statistics

Property Value
Variable Name Cosentyx
Aggregation Method SUM
Analysis Performed At 2019-06-26
Duration of Action 33 days
Kurtosis 132.27831578308
Mean 4.8617 milligrams
Median 0 milligrams
Minimum Allowed Value 0 milligrams
Number of Changes 50
Number of Correlations 96
Number of Measurements 30
Onset Delay 7 days
Standard Deviation 38.49010219756
Unit Milligrams
Variable ID 5538381
Variance 1481.4879671786

Sinus Inflammation Statistics

Property Value
Variable Name Sinus Inflammation
Aggregation Method MEAN
Analysis Performed At 2019-03-31
Duration of Action 7 days
Kurtosis 2.4457423021101
Maximum Allowed Value 5 out of 5
Mean 2.1063 out of 5
Median 2 out of 5
Minimum Allowed Value 1 out of 5
Number of Changes 262
Number of Correlations 1701
Number of Measurements 548
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.92074842733724
Unit 1 to 5 Rating
UPC 739934839591
Variable ID 5545331
Variance 0.847777666444

Tracking Cosentyx

Record your Cosentyx daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.

Tracking Sinus Inflammation

Record your Sinus Inflammation daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.
Join This Study

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-BHr4hyUWqZU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAIG28/2Lv0en738II/photo.jpg Principal Investigator - Mike Sinn