cause image
gauge image
effect image

Based on data from 2 participants, Guiltiness is generally lowest after a daily total of 23 grams of Unsaturated Fat intake over the previous 7 days.
Join This Study
Go To Interactive Study
People with higher Unsaturated Fat intake usually have higher Guiltiness
Each column represents the number of days this value occurred.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Unsaturated Fat on each day of the week.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Unsaturated Fat for each month of the year.
Each column represents the number of days this value occurred.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Guiltiness on each day of the week.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Guiltiness for each month of the year.

Abstract

Aggregated data from 2 study participants suggests with a medium degree of confidence (p=0.27940376324227, 95% CI -0.445 to 0.355) that Unsaturated Fat has a very weakly negative predictive relationship (R=-0.05) with Guiltiness. The highest quartile of Guiltiness measurements were observed following an average 20.43 grams Unsaturated Fat per day. The lowest quartile of Guiltiness measurements were observed following an average 22.328282006979 g Unsaturated Fat per day.

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the nature of the relationship (if any) between Unsaturated Fat and Guiltiness. Additionally, we attempt to determine the Unsaturated Fat values most likely to produce optimal Guiltiness values.

Participant Instructions

Record your Unsaturated Fat daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.
Record your Guiltiness daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.

Design

This study is based on data donated by 2 participants. Thus, the study design is equivalent to the aggregation of 2 separate n=1 observational natural experiments.

Data Analysis

Unsaturated Fat Pre-Processing
Unsaturated Fat measurement values below 0 grams were assumed erroneous and removed. No maximum allowed measurement value was defined for Unsaturated Fat. It was assumed that any gaps in Unsaturated Fat data were unrecorded 0 grams measurement values.
Unsaturated Fat Analysis Settings

Guiltiness Pre-Processing
Guiltiness measurement values below 1 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. Guiltiness measurement values above 5 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. No missing data filling value was defined for Guiltiness so any gaps in data were just not analyzed instead of assuming zero values for those times.
Guiltiness Analysis Settings

Predictive Analytics
It was assumed that 0 hours would pass before a change in Unsaturated Fat would produce an observable change in Guiltiness. It was assumed that Unsaturated Fat could produce an observable change in Guiltiness for as much as 7 days after the stimulus event.
Predictive Analysis Settings

Data Sources

Unsaturated Fat data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Guiltiness data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Limitations

As with any human experiment, it was impossible to control for all potentially confounding variables. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. We can never know for sure if one factor is definitely the cause of an outcome. However, lack of correlation definitely implies the lack of a causal relationship. Hence, we can with great confidence rule out non-existent relationships. For instance, if we discover no relationship between mood and an antidepressant this information is just as or even more valuable than the discovery that there is a relationship.
We can also take advantage of several characteristics of time series data from many subjects to infer the likelihood of a causal relationship if we do find a correlational relationship. The criteria for causation are a group of minimal conditions necessary to provide adequate evidence of a causal relationship between an incidence and a possible consequence.

The list of the criteria is as follows:
Strength (A.K.A. Effect Size)
A small association does not mean that there is not a causal effect, though the larger the association, the more likely that it is causal. There is a very weakly negative relationship between Unsaturated Fat intake and Guiltiness

Consistency (A.K.A. Reproducibility)
Consistent findings observed by different persons in different places with different samples strengthens the likelihood of an effect. Furthermore, in accordance with the law of large numbers (LLN), the predictive power and accuracy of these results will continually grow over time. 428 paired data points were used in this analysis. Assuming that the relationship is merely coincidental, as the participant independently modifies their Unsaturated Fat intake values, the observed strength of the relationship will decline until it is below the threshold of significance. To it another way, in the case that we do find a spurious correlation, suggesting that banana intake improves mood for instance, one will likely increase their banana intake. Due to the fact that this correlation is spurious, it is unlikely that you will see a continued and persistent corresponding increase in mood. So over time, the spurious correlation will naturally dissipate.

Specificity
Causation is likely if a very specific population at a specific site and disease with no other likely explanation. The more specific an association between a factor and an effect is, the bigger the probability of a causal relationship.

Temporality
The effect has to occur after the cause (and if there is an expected delay between the cause and expected effect, then the effect must occur after that delay). The confidence in a causal relationship is bolstered by the fact that time-precedence was taken into account in all calculations.

Biological Gradient
Greater exposure should generally lead to greater incidence of the effect. However, in some cases, the mere presence of the factor can trigger the effect. In other cases, an inverse proportion is observed: greater exposure leads to lower incidence.

Plausibility
A plausible bio-chemical mechanism between cause and effect is critical. This is where human brains excel. Based on our responses so far, 1 humans feel that there is a plausible mechanism of action and 0 feel that any relationship observed between Unsaturated Fat intake and Guiltiness is coincidental.

Coherence
Coherence between epidemiological and laboratory findings increases the likelihood of an effect. It will be very enlightening to aggregate this data with the data from other participants with similar genetic, diseasomic, environmentomic, and demographic profiles.

Experiment
All of human life can be considered a natural experiment. Occasionally, it is possible to appeal to experimental evidence.

Analogy
The effect of similar factors may be considered.

Relationship Statistics

Property Value
Cause Variable Name Unsaturated Fat intake
Effect Variable Name Guiltiness
Sinn Predictive Coefficient 0.0080775732821956
Confidence Level medium
Confidence Interval 0.40004445061449
Forward Pearson Correlation Coefficient -0.0453
Critical T Value 1.696
Total Unsaturated Fat intake Over Previous 7 days Before ABOVE Average Guiltiness 20.43 grams
Total Unsaturated Fat intake Over Previous 7 days Before BELOW Average Guiltiness 22.328282006979 grams
Duration of Action 7 days
Effect Size very weakly negative
Number of Paired Measurements 428
Optimal Pearson Product 0.019395478483274
P Value 0.27940376324227
Statistical Significance 0.50014998484403
Strength of Relationship 0.40004445061449
Study Type population
Analysis Performed At 2019-04-06
Number of Participants 2

Unsaturated Fat Statistics

Property Value
Variable Name Unsaturated Fat
Aggregation Method SUM
Analysis Performed At 2019-01-20
Duration of Action 7 days
Kurtosis 89.994567226135
Mean 5.45726125 grams
Median 2.2166816086158 grams
Minimum Allowed Value 0 grams
Number of Correlations 79
Number of Measurements 5048
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 16.620115757719
Unit Grams
Variable ID 1871
Variance 637.81497329279

Guiltiness Statistics

Property Value
Variable Name Guiltiness
Aggregation Method MEAN
Analysis Performed At 2019-03-26
Duration of Action 24 hours
Kurtosis 3.7212578791298
Maximum Allowed Value 5 out of 5
Mean 2.315524127182 out of 5
Median 2.249596093161 out of 5
Minimum Allowed Value 1 out of 5
Number of Correlations 631
Number of Measurements 31791
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.74731995879789
Unit 1 to 5 Rating
Variable ID 1335
Variance 0.8465948884929

Tracking Unsaturated Fat

Record your Unsaturated Fat daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.

Tracking Guiltiness

Record your Guiltiness daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.
Join This Study

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-BHr4hyUWqZU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAIG28/2Lv0en738II/photo.jpg Principal Investigator - Mike Sinn