This individual's Overall Mood is generally highest after an average of 2 out of 5 of Upsettedness over the previous 24 hours.
Join This Study
Go To Interactive Study
Blue represents the mean of Upsettedness over the previous 24 hours
An increase in 24 hours cumulative Upsettedness is usually followed by an decrease in Overall Mood. (R = -0.481)
Typical values for Overall Mood following a given amount of Upsettedness over the previous 24 hours.
Typical Upsettedness seen over the previous 24 hours preceding the given Overall Mood value.
Correlation between outcome and aggregated predictor measurements over given number of days
Peak correlation suggests the delay between predictor and observable outcome
This chart shows how Upsettedness changes over time.
Each column represents the number of days this value occurred.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Upsettedness on each day of the week.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Upsettedness for each month of the year.
This chart shows how Overall Mood changes over time.
Each column represents the number of days this value occurred.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Overall Mood on each day of the week.
This chart shows the typical value recorded for Overall Mood for each month of the year.

Abstract

This individual's Overall Mood is generally 6% higher than normal after an average of 2 out of 5 Upsettedness over the previous 24 hours. This individual's data suggests with a low degree of confidence (p=0.17789644002871, 95% CI -0.883 to -0.079) that Upsettedness has a moderately negative predictive relationship (R=-0.48) with Overall Mood. The highest quartile of Overall Mood measurements were observed following an average 2.19 out of 5 Upsettedness. The lowest quartile of Overall Mood measurements were observed following an average 3.2 /5 Upsettedness.Overall Mood is generally 6% lower than normal after an average of 3.2 out of 5 of Upsettedness over the previous 24 hours. Overall Mood is generally 6% higher after an average of 2.19 out of 5 of Upsettedness over the previous 24 hours.

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine the nature of the relationship (if any) between Upsettedness and Overall Mood. Additionally, we attempt to determine the Upsettedness values most likely to produce optimal Overall Mood values.

Participant Instructions

Record your Upsettedness daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.
Record your Overall Mood daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.

Design

This study is based on data donated by one participant. Thus, the study design is consistent with an n=1 observational natural experiment.

Data Analysis

Upsettedness Pre-Processing
Upsettedness measurement values below 1 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. Upsettedness measurement values above 5 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. No missing data filling value was defined for Upsettedness so any gaps in data were just not analyzed instead of assuming zero values for those times.
Upsettedness Analysis Settings

Overall Mood Pre-Processing
Overall Mood measurement values below 1 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. Overall Mood measurement values above 5 out of 5 were assumed erroneous and removed. No missing data filling value was defined for Overall Mood so any gaps in data were just not analyzed instead of assuming zero values for those times.
Overall Mood Analysis Settings

Predictive Analytics
It was assumed that 0 hours would pass before a change in Upsettedness would produce an observable change in Overall Mood. It was assumed that Upsettedness could produce an observable change in Overall Mood for as much as 1 days after the stimulus event.
Predictive Analysis Settings

Data Quantity
22 raw Upsettedness measurements with 12 changes spanning 948 days from 2013-08-30 to 2016-04-05 were used in this analysis. 13987 raw Overall Mood measurements with 1244 changes spanning 2612 days from 2012-05-06 to 2019-06-30 were used in this analysis.

Data Sources

Upsettedness data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Overall Mood data was primarily collected using QuantiModo. QuantiModo allows you to easily track mood, symptoms, or any outcome you want to optimize in a fraction of a second. You can also import your data from over 30 other apps and devices. QuantiModo then analyzes your data to identify which hidden factors are most likely to be influencing your mood or symptoms.

Limitations

As with any human experiment, it was impossible to control for all potentially confounding variables. Correlation does not necessarily imply causation. We can never know for sure if one factor is definitely the cause of an outcome. However, lack of correlation definitely implies the lack of a causal relationship. Hence, we can with great confidence rule out non-existent relationships. For instance, if we discover no relationship between mood and an antidepressant this information is just as or even more valuable than the discovery that there is a relationship.
We can also take advantage of several characteristics of time series data from many subjects to infer the likelihood of a causal relationship if we do find a correlational relationship. The criteria for causation are a group of minimal conditions necessary to provide adequate evidence of a causal relationship between an incidence and a possible consequence.

The list of the criteria is as follows:
Strength (A.K.A. Effect Size)
A small association does not mean that there is not a causal effect, though the larger the association, the more likely that it is causal. There is a moderately negative relationship between Upsettedness and Overall Mood

Consistency (A.K.A. Reproducibility)
Consistent findings observed by different persons in different places with different samples strengthens the likelihood of an effect. Furthermore, in accordance with the law of large numbers (LLN), the predictive power and accuracy of these results will continually grow over time. 16 paired data points were used in this analysis. Assuming that the relationship is merely coincidental, as the participant independently modifies their Upsettedness values, the observed strength of the relationship will decline until it is below the threshold of significance. To it another way, in the case that we do find a spurious correlation, suggesting that banana intake improves mood for instance, one will likely increase their banana intake. Due to the fact that this correlation is spurious, it is unlikely that you will see a continued and persistent corresponding increase in mood. So over time, the spurious correlation will naturally dissipate.

Specificity
Causation is likely if a very specific population at a specific site and disease with no other likely explanation. The more specific an association between a factor and an effect is, the bigger the probability of a causal relationship.

Temporality
The effect has to occur after the cause (and if there is an expected delay between the cause and expected effect, then the effect must occur after that delay). The confidence in a causal relationship is bolstered by the fact that time-precedence was taken into account in all calculations.

Biological Gradient
Greater exposure should generally lead to greater incidence of the effect. However, in some cases, the mere presence of the factor can trigger the effect. In other cases, an inverse proportion is observed: greater exposure leads to lower incidence.

Plausibility
A plausible bio-chemical mechanism between cause and effect is critical. This is where human brains excel. Based on our responses so far, 24 humans feel that there is a plausible mechanism of action and 3 feel that any relationship observed between Upsettedness and Overall Mood is coincidental.

Coherence
Coherence between epidemiological and laboratory findings increases the likelihood of an effect. It will be very enlightening to aggregate this data with the data from other participants with similar genetic, diseasomic, environmentomic, and demographic profiles.

Experiment
All of human life can be considered a natural experiment. Occasionally, it is possible to appeal to experimental evidence.

Analogy
The effect of similar factors may be considered.

Relationship Statistics

Property Value
Cause Variable Name Upsettedness
Effect Variable Name Overall Mood
Sinn Predictive Coefficient 0.0982
Confidence Level low
Confidence Interval 0.40187085710087
Forward Pearson Correlation Coefficient -0.481
Critical T Value 1.746
Average Upsettedness Over Previous 24 hours Before ABOVE Average Overall Mood 2.19 out of 5
Average Upsettedness Over Previous 24 hours Before BELOW Average Overall Mood 3.2 out of 5
Duration of Action 24 hours
Effect Size moderately negative
Number of Paired Measurements 16
Optimal Pearson Product 0.43521660560363
P Value 0.17789644002871
Statistical Significance 0.0659
Strength of Relationship 0.40187085710087
Study Type individual
Analysis Performed At 2019-06-18

Upsettedness Statistics

Property Value
Variable Name Upsettedness
Aggregation Method MEAN
Analysis Performed At 2019-06-30
Duration of Action 24 hours
Kurtosis 1.8524923711576
Maximum Allowed Value 5 out of 5
Mean 2.787 out of 5
Median 2.75 out of 5
Minimum Allowed Value 1 out of 5
Number of Changes 12
Number of Correlations 468
Number of Measurements 22
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 1.1684937451842
Unit 1 to 5 Rating
Variable ID 1475
Variance 1.3653776325345

Overall Mood Statistics

Property Value
Variable Name Overall Mood
Aggregation Method MEAN
Analysis Performed At 2019-07-01
Duration of Action 24 hours
Kurtosis 6.8291087361135
Maximum Allowed Value 5 out of 5
Mean 2.9077 out of 5
Median 3 out of 5
Minimum Allowed Value 1 out of 5
Number of Changes 1244
Number of Correlations 4032
Number of Measurements 13987
Onset Delay 0 seconds
Standard Deviation 0.52364864041834
Unit 1 to 5 Rating
UPC 767674073845
Variable ID 1398
Variance 0.27420789861198

Tracking Upsettedness

Record your Upsettedness daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.

Tracking Overall Mood

Record your Overall Mood daily in the reminder inbox or using the interactive web or mobile notifications.
Join This Study

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-BHr4hyUWqZU/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAIG28/2Lv0en738II/photo.jpg Principal Investigator - Mike Sinn